<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>评论：关于全球变暖与“Climate Change”的想当然</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekonomics10000.com/168/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekonomics10000.com/168</link>
	<description>用理工科思维理解世界</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>来自：同人于野</title>
		<link>http://www.geekonomics10000.com/168/comment-page-1#comment-2610</link>
		<dc:creator>同人于野</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekonomics10000.com/?p=168#comment-2610</guid>
		<description>这是支持变暖导致灾难性气候增加的重要论文了，多谢指出！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>这是支持变暖导致灾难性气候增加的重要论文了，多谢指出！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：ecocity</title>
		<link>http://www.geekonomics10000.com/168/comment-page-1#comment-2599</link>
		<dc:creator>ecocity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekonomics10000.com/?p=168#comment-2599</guid>
		<description>http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v3/n3/pdf/ngeo779.pdf

Quote from the abstract of Tropical cyclones and climate change on Nature Geoscience &quot; Future projections based on theory and high-resolution dynamical models consistently indicate that greenhouse warming will cause the globally averaged intensity of tropical cyclones to shift towards stronger storms, with intensity increases of 2-11% by 2100. Existing modelling studies also consistently project decreases in the globally averaged frequency of tropical cyclones, by 6-34%. Balanced against this, higher resolution modelling studies typically project substantial increases in the frequency of the most intense cyclones, and increases of the order of 20% in the precipitation rate within 100 km of the storm centre.&quot;

--Long story short, fewer but heavier tropical storms can be expected. By the way, the potential destructiveness of storms increases more steeply than the wind velocities; a 2-11% higher speed means a 6-37% higher destructiveness. (Emanuel 2005).

from realclimate
 &quot;http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/04/climate-scientist-bashing/comment-page-10/#comments&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v3/n3/pdf/ngeo779.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v3/n3/pdf/ngeo779.pdf</a></p>
<p>Quote from the abstract of Tropical cyclones and climate change on Nature Geoscience &#8221; Future projections based on theory and high-resolution dynamical models consistently indicate that greenhouse warming will cause the globally averaged intensity of tropical cyclones to shift towards stronger storms, with intensity increases of 2-11% by 2100. Existing modelling studies also consistently project decreases in the globally averaged frequency of tropical cyclones, by 6-34%. Balanced against this, higher resolution modelling studies typically project substantial increases in the frequency of the most intense cyclones, and increases of the order of 20% in the precipitation rate within 100 km of the storm centre.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Long story short, fewer but heavier tropical storms can be expected. By the way, the potential destructiveness of storms increases more steeply than the wind velocities; a 2-11% higher speed means a 6-37% higher destructiveness. (Emanuel 2005).</p>
<p>from realclimate<br />
 &#8220;http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/04/climate-scientist-bashing/comment-page-10/#comments&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：科学无定论：从手机辐射到全球变暖 &#171; 学而时嘻之</title>
		<link>http://www.geekonomics10000.com/168/comment-page-1#comment-2459</link>
		<dc:creator>科学无定论：从手机辐射到全球变暖 &#171; 学而时嘻之</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekonomics10000.com/?p=168#comment-2459</guid>
		<description>[...] 很多人认为是全球变暖会增加飓风等灾难性天气。的确有些科学家的模型认为这是真的，但这些模型并不完善。而另一些科学家则认为全球变暖会减少飓风的出现！风暴的产生是非常难以模拟的气象过程，不同的模型往往有完全相反的结论，总体而言，科学家并没有达成什么共识。历史记录也没有证据说现在的飓风比过去多。  数据采摘 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 很多人认为是全球变暖会增加飓风等灾难性天气。的确有些科学家的模型认为这是真的，但这些模型并不完善。而另一些科学家则认为全球变暖会减少飓风的出现！风暴的产生是非常难以模拟的气象过程，不同的模型往往有完全相反的结论，总体而言，科学家并没有达成什么共识。历史记录也没有证据说现在的飓风比过去多。  数据采摘 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>来自：Roger Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.geekonomics10000.com/168/comment-page-1#comment-1938</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekonomics10000.com/?p=168#comment-1938</guid>
		<description>Climate change is political topic. So it should be used as one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate change is political topic. So it should be used as one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
